The Way of the Warrior, by Chris Bradford

Before launching into my MMGM spotlight for today I have to put in a plug for author and writing coach David Farland.  He’s been on my radar for an embarrassingly long time, but I recently followed an impulse and dove into one of this books on writing.  It’s called Million Dollar Outlines, but I’m finding it goes into much more depth than your usual writing book on outlines, such as covering emotional beats, and understanding the needs of your target audience.  As a result of how fab this book is, I’ve signed up to attend his two day seminar Write That Novel 2.0, which will be in Indianapolis in a month or so here–say hi if you see me there!

Okay, on to my spotlight on Chris Bradford’s middle grade novel The Way of the Warrior…which I can give my almost one hundred percent approval! lol

Way of the Warrior cover

I found it a thoroughly enjoyable tale, and sufficiently gripping to keep me up nights reading.  It’s also one of those stories parents and teachers love, ’cause kids don’t notice that they’re being fed a bit of history (and a culture that doesn’t get featured enough!) while they enjoy an adventure.  However, there were a couple points that tripped me up.  The first was that the book begins in the pov of a boy who is immediately killed.  Then it shifts to the pov we stay in throughout the rest the novel.  And, while I can understand why the author made that choice, well, I liked the first pov better.  So, I found the shift challenging and really only hung in there initially because my kids wanted to know if the book was any good and I wanted to be able to give them a fair answer.  However, the new pov grows on you and in the end left me satisfied.

The second issue was that the main pov character, twelve-year-old Jack Fletcher, is really a modern kid who happens to be living in the 1600s.  His sensibilities, reaction to a new and unfamiliar culture, perspective on race, and sense of what is fair and right–all are thoroughly modern.  In contrast, the Japanese kids around him are biased–you might say racist–against the Gaijin in their midst, and while some are welcoming, others won’t respect him no matter what he does and treat him like he’s less than them just because he’s not Japanese.  As a result of this skewed perspective–presenting a British kid from the 1600s as tolerant and respectful of all people, ready to see them as his equals–the Japanese can come across as closed-minded and prejudiced.  In reality, pretty much all people of that time period would be considered prejudiced by modern standards, and the British were certainly no exception.

So, were I to share this book with a class or young readers, I would feel compelled to point out the inherent pov bias and resulting incongruity.  However, that would of itself be a valuable discussion, and isn’t a reason not to share the book.  It would also open up a great discussion as to why a writer might have chosen to give his main character modern sensibilities, and how the reader might have responded to a character whose perspective was historically accurate of the time.  And in the end, most kids will still have their perspective broadened by reading the novel, and the Japanese culture and Samurai are by no means portrayed in an unsympathetic light.

Let’s see what Apricot-kitty has to say:

Apricot Headshot one“Aren’t you supposed to be a martial artist?  How come I’ve never seen you do that butterfly move?  And why is it called a butterfly move, instead of something fierce like Flying Kitty?  Butterflies aren’t so great–I’ve caught them.  They taste like fuzzy cheetos.”

 

 

 

Eh, yes, have I mentioned that Apricot-kitty is quite the huntress?  She’s thankfully most interested in mice, but occasionally a dragonfly or butterfly falls to her paw.  And it is true that as a martial artist (with a history degree!) I was probably reading more critically than your average reader.  But, the martial arts scenes hold up and were very well-written, I thought!  I loved the focus on the basics, and that while there was a certain rather fantastic move pulled out at the end, learning it was earned and took months, not days or weeks, of concentrated effort to get down.  Much more realistic than your average kick-it-out movie!

For more Marvelous Middle-Grade Monday spotlights, reviews, interviews and giveaways, stop by the blog of our lovely host, Shannon Messenger!  And Happy Reading!

MMGM2

Share, share away:

7 Comments

  1. Reply

    Thanks for the heads-up on the writing resource by David Farland. I’ll be looking into that one. Loved your review on The Way of the Warrior. It would make a good read-aloud and I like the intriguing storyline. Thanks for featuring.

  2. Reply

    This actually sounds quite interesting, I’ll check it out. It’s too bad about the issues you mentioned with prejudice. It’s incredibly important for authors to be careful when it comes to this sort of thing because anything kids watch, read, etc. really affects their worldview. Thanks for featuring this!

  3. Reply

    I read an ARC of this book! But it’s been so long I’d forgotten the change in POV in the beginning. Interesting what we remember and what we don’t when a few years go by. From what I recall, it was pretty dark for MG, but I enjoyed the fast pace and the martial arts aspects, plus the tidbits of Japanese culture and language. Kind of a kids’ version of Shogun, the miniseries from many years ago.

  4. Reply

    I one hundred percent agree on that, Reader Noir! And I feel I should say that this was one of those subtle slips that most people probably wouldn’t even note. But, I noted, so I passed it on.

    Joanne it is interesting which things you remember from a book, and which parts jump out at you! I probably should have mentioned the violence, but it felt like such a seamless part of the story I didn’t notice it. Rather like Airman, by Eoin Colfer, in that regard.

  5. Reply

    This sounds intriguing! I do love the Samurai period, and it isn’t covered a lot in literature, especially kidlit. But what you say about the historical inaccuracies is a little troubling. It is a pet peeve of mine that we seem to see this more in kidlit than elsewhere. I think authors are afraid of influencing kids, as Reader Noir said.
    But since I love this time period, I’ll have to check this one out.

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *